Re: star 1.5a25 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu): diff reports many different uname, gname
Marc Rechté <[email protected]> Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:28:22 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.archivers.star.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
OK I dared to download and compile the a77 version. I read carefully the readme files concerning the gnu make warnings that I got. Are they harmful ? I got some more messages at the end in mt.c (see below). Can I just use /opt/schilly/bin/star in place of the Red Hat version or do I need to install all the files at their original location ? Thanks [[email protected] star-1.5]$ make > make.log W A R N I N G Messages like: gmake[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/cdrtools-2.01/libschily' ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/cvmod.d: No such file or directory ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/dat.d: No such file or directory ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/fcons.d: No such file or directory ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/fdown.d: No such file or directory ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/fdup.d: No such file or directory ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/ffileread.d: No such file or directory ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/ffilewrite.d: No such file or directory ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/fgetline.d: No such file or directory ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/fgetstr.d: No such file or directory ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/file_raise.d: No such file or directory ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/fileclose.d: No such file or directory .... are caused by a GNU make bug and not by the Schily makefile system. The related bug has been reported to the GNU make maintainers in 1998 but as the bug has not yet been fixed, it seems that GNU make is unmaintained :-( A working highly portable make program is at ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/smake RULES/rules1.top:239: incs/Dcc.x86_64-linux: Aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce type RULES/rules.cnf:54: incs/x86_64-linux-cc/Inull: Aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce type RULES/rules.cnf:55: incs/x86_64-linux-cc/rules.cnf: Aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce type W A R N I N G Messages like: gmake[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/cdrtools-2.01/libschily' ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/cvmod.d: No such file or directory ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/dat.d: No such file or directory ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/fcons.d: No such file or directory ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/fdown.d: No such file or directory ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/fdup.d: No such file or directory ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/ffileread.d: No such file or directory ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/ffilewrite.d: No such file or directory ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/fgetline.d: No such file or directory ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/fgetstr.d: No such file or directory ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/file_raise.d: No such file or directory ../RULES/r-gmake.dep:76: OBJ/<arch-dir>/fileclose.d: No such file or directory .... are caused by a GNU make bug and not by the Schily makefile system. The related bug has been reported to the GNU make maintainers in 1998 but as the bug has not yet been fixed, it seems that GNU make is unmaintained :-( A working highly portable make program is at ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/smake ../RULES/rules.ins:27: attention : écrasement des commandes pour la cible « /opt/schily » ../RULES/rules.ins:22: attention : anciennes commandes ignorées pour la cible « /opt/schily » ../RULES/rules.ins:30: attention : écrasement des commandes pour la cible « ../bins/x86_64-linux-cc » ../RULES/rules.ins:24: attention : anciennes commandes ignorées pour la cible « ../bins/x86_64-linux-cc » Warning: Cannot scan stack on this environment. mt.c: In function `mtioctl': mt.c:587: attention : comparaison est toujours fausse en raison d'une gamme limitée de type de données [[email protected] star-1.5]$ > The latest version has a lot of workarounds for knowb Linux include file > problems and should compile out of the box. > > Anyway: a self compiles version cannot be worse than the version you are using > that seems to suffer from a libc interface problem. > > Jörg >