Re: unable to complete huge backup
Udo Rader <[email protected]> Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:05:12 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.archivers.star.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | BestSolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 16:33 +0100, Udo Rader wrote: > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 21:59 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > Udo Rader <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Now comes the fun part & I'll see how well star behaves now. Hi, I just wanted to report back a bit ... star is working now as expected. The problems I had gave me an opportunity to once more try two other tar tools around (bsdtar, pax). Both of the tools took a significant longer time to perform the 120GB backup: bsdtar took almost 11 hours pax took almost 10 hours and star finally takes about 8 hours so yes, star is indeed the fastest tar implementation around :-) Having very limited experience with tape drives, I would however really like to get some more feedback on how to speed up the process even more. So far I have learned that tuning can happen at 3 places: * the block size * the fifo size * bios settings on the tape controller any good pointers on how to set these things? My current invocation looks like this: /opt/schily/bin/star \ errctl="WARN|GROW|SHRINK|OPEN|READ|READLINK|MISSLINK *" \ b=4096 \ -fifostats \ fs=32m \ -c \ -acl artype=exustar \ -f /dev/st0 \ ${BACKUPDIR} >>${LOGFILE} 2>&1 Thanks in advance! -- Udo Rader bestsolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH http://www.bestsolution.at _______________________________________________ Star-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/star-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHX6RFuhFd84GLxP8RAt6wAJ96LRErModsUXmlJ5yyaiadxPIOTQCcD+tQ aGZYyN2gi6qanpfFjifDtdw= =4r58 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----