Re: refuse to update certain files upon extraction
[email protected] (Joerg Schilling) Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:45:30 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.archivers.star.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <47dff1aa.oK0D+lIYWtzqBZbU%[email protected]> |
Lasse Kliemann <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm getting really close now. > > Remember that I wrote last week that I could reproduce this on ext2, ext3= , = > xfs, and reiserfs? It turned out that on each of them -save ext3- the pro= blem = > was due to that 'rapid dump' thing. If I insert a sleep 1 after the dump,= the = > problem only persists on ext3. Now we also have the explanation why the = > problem disappeared on Solaris after I inserted the sleep 1. So do you propose to add a sleep(1) into star.c before it starts with the incremental dump and to use >=3D for the time compare? J=F6rg -- = EMail:[email protected] (home) J=F6rg Schilling D-13353 Be= rlin [email protected] (uni) = [email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspo= t.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/sch= ily