Re: includes and incremental backups
[email protected] (Joerg Schilling) Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:53:28 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.archivers.star.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <49ddb788.vcP4vW49WmqJ35dm%[email protected]> |
"Jacob Shucart" <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm trying to do full and incremental backups using star(version 1.5a75 f= or > the Lustre filesystem) and it does not seem to be doing them. The command > that is being used for the full backup is is: Why do you use a 3 year old version although star-1.5-final was published a = year ago? > /usr/bin/star -c -f - -C /lustretest fs-name=3D/lustretest -xdev -link-di= rs \ = > > -level=3Do -wtardumps tardumps=3D/etc/tardumps -xattr -acl H=3Dexustar \ > > "errctl=3DWARN|SAMEFILE|DIFF|GROW|SHRINK|SPECIALFILE|GETXATTR|BADACL *"= \ = > > -sparse -dodesc list=3D/tmp/test/lustretest.include There is no level "o". > And for the incremental backup: > > = > > /usr/bin/star -c -f - -C /lustretest fs-name=3D/lustretest -xdev -link-di= rs \ = > > -level=3D1 -wtardumps tardumps=3D/etc/tardumps -xattr -acl H=3Dexustar \ > > "errctl=3DWARN|SAMEFILE|DIFF|GROW|SHRINK|SPECIALFILE|GETXATTR|BADACL *"= \ = > > -sparse -dodesc list=3D/tmp/test/lustretest.include > > = > > I should mention that /tmp/test/lustretest.include is a text file that > contains: > > ./jacob If this is a directory and in case that never ever a file is renamed from = outside the tree in "jacob" to a path that is inside "jacob", this may = theoretically work. > In both cases, star updates the timestamp on /etc/tardumps, but it doesn't > add anything to it and both of the backups are identical. Is this a > limitation of star when it is using the include list? Or is this a bug t= hat > is fixed in a newer version of star? If it is fixed in a newer version, > does the newer version also have support for the Lustre filesystem? Plea= se > let me know. Thank you. It may be that you are a victim of a filesystem implementation bug on your = OS and that your filesystem does not support sufficiently POSIX compliant time = stamps. It may be that your problem is that you do not use the official syntax for = incremental backups that is documented in the man page..... A a full or incremental dump is done via star -c -M level=3Dsomething -C some-dir . BTW: this syntax is enforced by star in case that the dumplevel is >=3D 0. P.S.: As there recently have been some minor bug-fixes, I recommend not to = use = star-1.5 but the fixed star-1.5 version from = ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily/ = the Schily Source consolidation. J=F6rg -- = EMail:[email protected] (home) J=F6rg Schilling D-13353 Be= rlin [email protected] (uni) = [email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogs= pot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily