Re: Automation control point problem in A3

Thomas Vecchione <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.ardour.devel
Message-ID <CANo8TMqkcpVoq67f5dnFkK5+bX+QTGMxGt2sAjaWmT9UCxPR-g@mail.gmail.com>
I think that Mixbus's behavior could be looked at here, where you can click
and drag L/R to create a range, then click and drag up/down so that you
create a total of four points, one just outside the range on either side at
the original values, and one just inside at the new values.  When I want to
maintain the original values on either side of an edit, it is exceedingly
rare I want just a single point, but instead want to raise or lower a
section, so I would find this preferable.

On the other hand, if I am drawing in automation manually, I am more like
John in that I wouldn't want points in on either side, I find if I am
single clicking to create a point, this is most often what I am doing.  A
modifier may or may not be appropriate here I suppose to get this action,
it is certainly the lesser of the actions I usually take as I often draw in
automation by writing a fader, but not always.

      Seablade


On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Jörn Nettingsmeier <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On 02/15/2014 11:21 AM, John Rigg wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 09:46:25AM +0000, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 09:12:27AM +0000, John Rigg wrote:
>>>
>>>  Manually deleting the second point every time
>>>> is too much of a slowdown in work flow.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Moving it to some convenient spot will be faster. But yes, being
>>> able to create just a single point would be a good thing.
>>>
>>
>> I often need to move the extra point more than a short distance.
>> I much prefer Ardour 2's behaviour here. As only one other user apart
>> from me has mentioned this issue on Mantis, I guess I'm in a very small
>> minority (hence my interest in modifying my own copy of 3.0).
>>
>
> i would like to see both. maybe a modifier-click could be used to create
> two points, and the default is one point? and i agree with fons that some
> separation between the points would help a lot, but then the question is:
> what zoom level do you assume? something like "1/50 of the editor canvas
> width" would be cool, but i guess that'd be hairy to implement... perhaps
> make a fixed offset configurable and put the burden on the user?
>
>
> --
> Jörn Nettingsmeier
> Lortzingstr. 11, 45128 Essen, Tel. +49 177 7937487
>
> Meister für Veranstaltungstechnik (Bühne/Studio)
> Tonmeister VDT
>
> http://stackingdwarves.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ardour-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-dev-ardour.org
>

_______________________________________________
ardour-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-dev-ardour.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.