Re: loop recording fixes

Paul Davis <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.ardour.devel
Message-ID <CAFa_cKnqaTYnQJ_uN+79xyO3dHL+w7g3CV-eM_mz340fpkDhaw@mail.gmail.com>
there are some more improvements in git.

i find that i cannot move the loop markers while recording .....

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Joe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I tested against git g48b904f and looped punch in/out worked as I would
> expect it to. I did sometimes get issues with the transport going past the
> end loop marker, which I've also seen in the 4.2 production release. I
> haven't been able to reliably recreate the running past the end loop marker
> but I think it has something to do with the loop as a transport mode, having
> the transport loop, and then moving the loop markers without first turning
> off loop mode.
>
> On 09/28/2015 05:57 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
>
> I've just pushed a bunch of fixes for looped recording to ardour's git
> repository.
>
> I'd appreciate it if people would give them a try. Looped recording
> has been basically broken in various ways for a long time, particular
> when using non-seamless looping which I suspect has *never* worked.
>
> Feedback is welcome. A hint (from Ben Loftis @ Harrison) that makes
> loop recording more useful: set up the punch range inside the loop
> range, starting later than the loop. This gives you some "pre-roll" to
> allow more natural and precise punches.
>
> I'm not 100% interested in radical ways to improve looped recording -
> more just looking for confirmation that things work now - but I'll
> listen if people have such ideas.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ardour-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-dev-ardour.org
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.