Re: OSC next
Len Ovens <[email protected]> Fri, 13 May 2016 09:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.ardour.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 13 May 2016, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > On 05/13/2016 12:38 AM, Len Ovens wrote: >> Quick question for those interested. >> >> Right now I have 4 different kinds of fader control (route gain): >> absolute gain, >> gain in dB, >> fader position and >> fader position as an uint. ... >> >> So my question is: should I keep all four messages intact or just use >> the one /strip/gain? (this would also impact /master/gain and >> /monitor/gain which I am working on now) > > can't comment on whether to retain all, but if only one remains, it should be > about physical fader position, not gain. it should be up to the DAW to decide > what a fader position means, and the controller's job is just to mimic the > GUI fader. Yes, in the remote control surface, position is what is important. The question is more about other applications where some other kind of math makes more sense... what are these "other applications" and what do they need? -- Len Ovens www.ovenwerks.net _______________________________________________ ardour-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-dev-ardour.org