Re: let's talk about MIDI regions
Thorsten Wilms <[email protected]> Fri, 3 Mar 2017 15:52:17 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.ardour.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 03.03.2017 11:02, Paul Davis wrote: > one idea that is in the air for Ardour 6.0 is to move away from the idea > of MIDI regions entirely. Having no linked MIDI regions would render Ardour virtually useless for producing Techno and similarly repetitive styles. I have plenty of experience working with keyboard-integrated sequencers without region-concept. I ended up using range-copy again and again and again ... with notes on paper to stay oriented. Now one could think that "edit it one place and have it updated everywhere else" could be offered without MIDI regions in their current form. You need something like a range and it would be nice to offer offsets for start and end of each instance ... which surely ends up looking just like the current regions. Even if the only copies would be for an entire refrain in a traditional song structure, the user should be able to see whether there is an exact copy in place and not have to look over many dozen notes and be left wondering. I think their should be more regions, not fewer. Any piece of automation should allow linked copies. To not even start about multi-target automation ... oops. I guess MIDI overdubbing requires adding and replacing modes. If you want to create a new, overlapping region, and overlapping regions in one track are to be avoided (must/should they?), it should be made fast and easy enough to add a new track hooked up to the same strip. -- Thorsten Wilms thorwil's design for free software: http://thorwil.wordpress.com/