Re: analog summing
Brent Busby <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.ardour.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | Studio Amadeus |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Will J Godfrey <[email protected]> writes: > Analog systems using discrete components in conventional configurations will by > their nature add a tiny amount of even-order distortion, mostly 2nd harmonic > and it's this that gives to impression of thickening the sound. They will > sometimes also add some odd-order distortion but that usually ends up macking > the sound less pleasant. > > I'm talking really tiny amounts here, barley measurable. Too much and the > impression breaks down and you recognise the individual harmonics. Yeah, it's subtle. You don't notice it until you listen to it direct, and then you wonder where all the presence went. It's why I've got a mixer even though it takes a rediculous amount of room on my desk that could have been used for something else. I think what you're talking about is also why, now that in the 2010's that keyboard companies are starting to make real (not virtual DSP-based) analog synthesizers again, most of them have been pretty boring up until very recently. Most of them have been built with extremely well manufactured surface mount technology that came out of the same sort of engineering that gave us big 21 inch CRT monitors that could display 1600x1200 the analog way. They were about as analog as you can get -- a big high voltage electron gun painting lines on phosphor -- but we became so good at making those circuits that, by the end of the CRT era, we were driving the raster scans at high frequencies with very good performance. We'd basically gotten to where we could make an analog circuit perform like digital. Now we're trying to make analog synthesizers again, and we want them to sound like the ones we had in the 70's and 80's. We just don't know how to build circuits with problems like that anymore. It's a lost art. It's actually taken a few generations of 2000's equipment for any of these new synthesizers to have anything near the sort of character we expect. The funny thing is, it's not that they aren't real analog -- they are, really. They're just made too well. It took the keyboard manufacturers from about 1997 (roughly when the analog rebirth began) to about 2007 or so to stop thinking they could just give us DSP algorithms and we'd be happy, and now it's taken from about then to now to start making real analogs that sound like real analogs. We just have to relearn the old art of making shoddy circuitry. It takes practice. -- - Brent Busby + =============================================== + With the rise of social networking -- Studio -- + sites, computers are making people -- Amadeus -- + easier to use every day. ----------------+ =============================================== _______________________________________________ Ardour-Users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or change your mailing preferences please visit: http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org