Re: Faderport: more options ?
jonetsu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.ardour.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20180109224227.07d6bbc8@mevla> |
On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 22:13:37 -0500 Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > We're not likely to do any work on such features in the foreseeable > future. > > The code is all there, if somebody else wants to play with it to do > this. > > I implemented the faderport support with the intention to honor > Presonus' design of the device. You can make an argument that every > button should just be "a button", and every other control device on > it should be "a device", and the user should just be able to map them > all, and do whatever they want. > > That's what open source is for. All right. I might take up the "challenge". It would be a nice way to get back into coding. Is this mailing list here the right place to ask about coding aspects ? Cheers. _______________________________________________ Ardour-Users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or change your mailing preferences please visit: http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org