Re: Faderport: more options ?
Jörn Nettingsmeier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.ardour.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 01/10/2018 05:46 AM, Robin Gareus wrote: > On 01/10/2018 02:58 AM, jonetsu wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Would it be possible to offer more options for Faderport actions for >> Shift- and Long Press- Trns and Footswitch ? Like offering to whole >> gamut as in user ? >> > > Keep in mind that this may make for a less than ideal user-interface. > There's only so much you can get out of a single fader and a few buttons > while keeping the UI ergonomic. > > Perhaps you could re-assign one button to function as "Link", alike the > Faderport8 and Faderport16 control-link mode. > ie. make the rotary encoder (or fader) control the the currently focused > (mouse over) element in the GUI. That also works for plugin-controls or > any automatable. I guess the usecase is this: 99.99% use the faderport as intended. 0.01% hey, now I would really like to be able to just make this fader "MIDI-learn" and write out automation for <obscure-plugin-parameter>. So no fundamental usability change, just "pause original function, do something special", then "switch back". -- Jörn Nettingsmeier De Rijpgracht 8, 1055VR Amsterdam, Nederland Tel. +49 177 7937487 Meister für Veranstaltungstechnik (Bühne/Studio), Tonmeister VDT http://stackingdwarves.net _______________________________________________ Ardour-Users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or change your mailing preferences please visit: http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org