Re: Recording to Midi accompaniment

Paul Davis <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.ardour.user
Message-ID <CAFa_cKnW+_d3M+PqiWpvP6-Zz_AsW3s-Fs+qeCygjfijX7NDSQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 5:35 AM, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote:

> Paul Davis <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > Ardour's own audio/MIDI backend use realtime scheduling as well. It was
> > written by the same people who wrote JACK, except with the benefit of
> > another decade's worth of experience.
>
> Looks like most of my replies here get lost in moderation for some
> reason.


​There is no moderation on this list except for posts by non-members, which
are ignored.​


> Let me just reply to this point: I find it makes good sense to
> run the realtime code from a separate program in order to limit its
> footprint.


​What do you think Ardour (or any other DAW or processing application) is
doing in its process() callback? A substantial part of the core of the
Ardour runs realtime because its job is processing audio/MIDI ... that's
true whether or not you use JACK or Ardour's own internal audio/MIDI
backends. There's way more code that runs realtime than the part directly
woken by waiting on one or more audio/MIDI devices.



​

_______________________________________________
Ardour-Users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe  or change your mailing preferences please visit:
http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.