Re: Current best method for multi-band compression within Ardour?
jys <[email protected]> Sun, 18 Nov 2018 16:13:46 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.ardour.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1542586426.2468482.1581247152.11F76D1B@webmail.messagingengine.com> |
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018, at 19:48, Robin Gareus wrote: > > In the free/libre software eco-system zamulticomp [1] is probably the > best solution at this point in time. If you're using Linux, it may also > already bundled with your GNU/Linux distribution via the zam-plugins > package. Thanks, just built them (Slackware user here, don't laugh!) and I'm curious about this DISTRHO framework... I'm assuming this is a "legitimate" UI toolkit per the earlier discussion on this list? > If you're not excluding commercial solutions, Harrison's XT-MC [2,3] > would be the go to solution. It's bundled with Ardour binaries from > ardour.org. Not absolutely excluding, but I do prefer open source, and I probably won't have any driving need to go beyond that in the near future. Definitely won't be going to the extent of wine/VST monkey business. :) > Calf's multiband compressor may be nice to sculpt some interesting synth > sounds, but it is likely not very useful for any serious work. I would describe my use case as usually leaning towards "interesting" more than "serious", since I don't think of this kind of processing as retaining anything like "fidelity" anyway, and wouldn't be using it where "natural" sound was the goal. That said, I'm curious to A/B the Zam and Calf plugins with similar settings and see what my subjective impression is. Thanks, all, for the pointers and interesting discussion! -- jys _______________________________________________ Ardour-Users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or change your mailing preferences please visit: http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org