Re: ambix LV2 vs ardour?
[email protected] Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:21:16 +0100 (CET)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.ardour.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1734985651.61287424.1550755276739.JavaMail.root@zimbra35-e6.priv.proxad.net> |
Hello, Instead of just ldd, can you try "ldd -r" sometime ldd doesn't show every problem and forcing a reloc will show the problem. Best regards, YC ----- Mail original ----- De: "Robin Gareus" <[email protected]> À: [email protected] Envoyé: Jeudi 21 Février 2019 14:11:23 Objet: Re: [Ardour-Users] ambix LV2 vs ardour? On 2/21/19 8:06 AM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote > # ldd /usr/lib64/lv2/ambix_converter_o1.lv2/ambix_converter_o1.so > linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffff87fa000) > libzita-convolver.so.3 => /lib64/libzita-convolver.so.3 > (0x00007f8f1047f000) > libX11.so.6 => /lib64/libX11.so.6 (0x00007f8f1033a000) > libXext.so.6 => /lib64/libXext.so.6 (0x00007f8f10325000) > libXinerama.so.1 => /lib64/libXinerama.so.1 (0x00007f8f10320000) > libasound.so.2 => /lib64/libasound.so.2 (0x00007f8f10218000) > libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f8f10212000) > libfreetype.so.6 => /lib64/libfreetype.so.6 (0x00007f8f10152000) > librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x00007f8f10148000) > libglut.so.3 => /lib64/libglut.so.3 (0x00007f8f10090000) > libXmu.so.6 => /lib64/libXmu.so.6 (0x00007f8f10073000) > libXi.so.6 => /lib64/libXi.so.6 (0x00007f8f10061000) > libGL.so.1 => /lib64/libGL.so.1 (0x00007f8f0ffcd000) > libGLU.so.1 => /lib64/libGLU.so.1 (0x00007f8f0ff59000) > libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f8f0ff37000) > libstdc++.so.6 => /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007f8f0fd9f000) > libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007f8f0fc1b000) > libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f8f0fc00000) > libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f8f0fa3a000) > libfftw3f.so.3 => /lib64/libfftw3f.so.3 (0x00007f8f0f827000) > libxcb.so.1 => /lib64/libxcb.so.1 (0x00007f8f0f7fc000) > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f8f10991000) > libbz2.so.1 => /lib64/libbz2.so.1 (0x00007f8f0f7e9000) > libpng16.so.16 => /lib64/libpng16.so.16 (0x00007f8f0f7b3000) > libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007f8f0f799000) > libICE.so.6 => /lib64/libICE.so.6 (0x00007f8f0f779000) > libXxf86vm.so.1 => /lib64/libXxf86vm.so.1 (0x00007f8f0f772000) > libXt.so.6 => /lib64/libXt.so.6 (0x00007f8f0f707000) > libGLX.so.0 => /lib64/libGLX.so.0 (0x00007f8f0f6d3000) > libGLdispatch.so.0 => /lib64/libGLdispatch.so.0 (0x00007f8f0f616000) > libXau.so.6 => /lib64/libXau.so.6 (0x00007f8f0f60f000) > libSM.so.6 => /lib64/libSM.so.6 (0x00007f8f0f604000) > libuuid.so.1 => /lib64/libuuid.so.1 (0x00007f8f0f5fb000) > > (so lots of things...) Ok. I'm pretty sure that this is the issue. In particular if qtractor loads it. The solution is to statically link the plugin and hide its symbols except for the entry point. Plugins should not depend on any external libs. The short explanation is that Plugins cannot know about each other, and hence must be self-contained. --- Say you write a plugin that needs ffmpeg and uses the newer libswresample2 interface, and another author writes a plugin that uses the older libswresample1 API. Now you dynamically link both. Distros may even package both library versions, and you can compile and link, but if you load both at the same time in the same host, there is a conflict. [ from http://lists.ardour.org/pipermail/ardour-users-ardour.org/2018-November/028948.html ] --- In your case likely libfftw3f or zita-convolver that conflicts with Ardour's use of it, but it could be any lib, including libstdc++ (except X11). Cheers! robin _______________________________________________ Ardour-Users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or change your mailing preferences please visit: http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org _______________________________________________ Ardour-Users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or change your mailing preferences please visit: http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org