Re: ambix LV2 vs ardour?

Seablade - <[email protected]> Sat, 23 Feb 2019 16:32:35 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.ardour.user
Message-ID <CANo8TMrrOSTKD6qJdZpk42xV6dHt3Q-3Kg_wvjJN6dQM7bY8Xg@mail.gmail.com>
Attached to the bottom of every email (Make sure you view the full email,
some email clients 'hide' this by default) are instructions on how to
unsubscribe so that you no longer receive emails.

          Seablade

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 4:29 AM Patrick Kuhn Botelho <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Could you PLEASE stop sending me fucking emails? I am not using ardour for
> 3 Years and you keep clogging up my inbox!
> ------------------------------
> *Von:* Ardour-Users <[email protected]> im Auftrag
> von [email protected] <[email protected]>
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 21. Februar 2019 14:21
> *An:* Robin Gareus
> *Cc:* [email protected]
> *Betreff:* Re: [Ardour-Users] ambix LV2 vs ardour?
>
> Hello,
>
> Instead of just ldd, can you try "ldd -r" sometime ldd doesn't show every
> problem and forcing a reloc will show the problem.
>
> Best regards,
>
> YC
>
> ----- Mail original -----
> De: "Robin Gareus" <[email protected]>
> À: [email protected]
> Envoyé: Jeudi 21 Février 2019 14:11:23
> Objet: Re: [Ardour-Users] ambix LV2 vs ardour?
>
> On 2/21/19 8:06 AM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote
> > # ldd /usr/lib64/lv2/ambix_converter_o1.lv2/ambix_converter_o1.so
> >     linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffff87fa000)
> >     libzita-convolver.so.3 => /lib64/libzita-convolver.so.3
> > (0x00007f8f1047f000)
> >     libX11.so.6 => /lib64/libX11.so.6 (0x00007f8f1033a000)
> >     libXext.so.6 => /lib64/libXext.so.6 (0x00007f8f10325000)
> >     libXinerama.so.1 => /lib64/libXinerama.so.1 (0x00007f8f10320000)
> >     libasound.so.2 => /lib64/libasound.so.2 (0x00007f8f10218000)
> >     libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f8f10212000)
> >     libfreetype.so.6 => /lib64/libfreetype.so.6 (0x00007f8f10152000)
> >     librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x00007f8f10148000)
> >     libglut.so.3 => /lib64/libglut.so.3 (0x00007f8f10090000)
> >     libXmu.so.6 => /lib64/libXmu.so.6 (0x00007f8f10073000)
> >     libXi.so.6 => /lib64/libXi.so.6 (0x00007f8f10061000)
> >     libGL.so.1 => /lib64/libGL.so.1 (0x00007f8f0ffcd000)
> >     libGLU.so.1 => /lib64/libGLU.so.1 (0x00007f8f0ff59000)
> >     libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f8f0ff37000)
> >     libstdc++.so.6 => /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007f8f0fd9f000)
> >     libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007f8f0fc1b000)
> >     libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f8f0fc00000)
> >     libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f8f0fa3a000)
> >     libfftw3f.so.3 => /lib64/libfftw3f.so.3 (0x00007f8f0f827000)
> >     libxcb.so.1 => /lib64/libxcb.so.1 (0x00007f8f0f7fc000)
> >     /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f8f10991000)
> >     libbz2.so.1 => /lib64/libbz2.so.1 (0x00007f8f0f7e9000)
> >     libpng16.so.16 => /lib64/libpng16.so.16 (0x00007f8f0f7b3000)
> >     libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007f8f0f799000)
> >     libICE.so.6 => /lib64/libICE.so.6 (0x00007f8f0f779000)
> >     libXxf86vm.so.1 => /lib64/libXxf86vm.so.1 (0x00007f8f0f772000)
> >     libXt.so.6 => /lib64/libXt.so.6 (0x00007f8f0f707000)
> >     libGLX.so.0 => /lib64/libGLX.so.0 (0x00007f8f0f6d3000)
> >     libGLdispatch.so.0 => /lib64/libGLdispatch.so.0 (0x00007f8f0f616000)
> >     libXau.so.6 => /lib64/libXau.so.6 (0x00007f8f0f60f000)
> >     libSM.so.6 => /lib64/libSM.so.6 (0x00007f8f0f604000)
> >     libuuid.so.1 => /lib64/libuuid.so.1 (0x00007f8f0f5fb000)
> >
> > (so lots of things...)
>
> Ok. I'm pretty sure that this is the issue. In particular if qtractor
> loads it.
>
> The solution is to statically link the plugin and hide its symbols
> except for the entry point. Plugins should not depend on any external libs.
>
> The short explanation is that Plugins cannot know about each other, and
> hence must be self-contained.
>
> ---
> Say you write a plugin that needs ffmpeg and uses the newer
> libswresample2 interface, and another author writes a plugin that uses
> the older libswresample1 API. Now you dynamically link both.
>
> Distros may even package both library versions, and you can compile and
> link, but if you load both at the same time in the same host, there is a
> conflict.
>
> [ from
>
> http://lists.ardour.org/pipermail/ardour-users-ardour.org/2018-November/028948.html
> ]
> ---
>
> In your case likely libfftw3f or zita-convolver that conflicts with
> Ardour's use of it, but it could be any lib, including libstdc++ (except
> X11).
>
> Cheers!
> robin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ardour-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe  or change your mailing preferences please visit:
> http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org
> _______________________________________________
> Ardour-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe  or change your mailing preferences please visit:
> http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org
> _______________________________________________
> Ardour-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe  or change your mailing preferences please visit:
> http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org
>

_______________________________________________
Ardour-Users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe  or change your mailing preferences please visit:
http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org