Re: export format profile
"Chris Caudle" <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:57:25 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.ardour.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, February 28, 2019 4:17 am, Anahata wrote: > I usually choose "triangular", for what it's worth. Triangular, either shaped or flat, is the appropriate distribution function to use. No dither will cause the quantization noise to be highly signal correlated, i.e. what most people would call pure distortion rather than noise. No dither is never the appropriate choice. Rectangular probability distribution function will still cause some correlation of the quantization noise with the signal, so the quantization noise sounds like what you would call noise rather than distortion, but the noise is not constant, it can "pump" with the signal level. I do not know why rectangular PDF is even a choice, it saves a trivial amount of processing power and is mathematically shown to not serve the purpose of making quantization noise fully independent of the signal. Triangular probability distribution function has been shown mathematically and through listening tests to make the quantization noise audibly independent of the signal, which is the desirable situation. Shaped noise is just an equalized version of the dither signal (assuming it is really just shaped dither, and not a scheme with a feedback loop). Same noise modulation requirements apply, if the dither is going to be shaped it should still start as triangular PDF, but will have to be higher amplitude overall to account for the energy removed by the filtering. Usually provides no audible benefit in my experience, although the benefit is at least arguable, unlike the choice of no dither or rectangular PDF which are mathematically demonstrably wrong. I don't want to come across as rude, but please ignore completely what Gunter wrote, it was essentially wrong in every point. If you really want to understand the mathematical basis behind quantization then please search out papers by Lipshitz and Vanderkooy, or the PhD thesis of their student Robert Wannamaker, "The Theory of Dithered Quantization." Can be found online here: http://www.robertwannamaker.com/writings/rw_phd.pdf If you don't care to understand the details then just pick triangular dither and get on with making music. -- Chris Caudle _______________________________________________ Ardour-Users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or change your mailing preferences please visit: http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org