Re: OT: jack_iodelay outside jack
Tweed <[email protected]> Mon, 28 Jun 2021 19:13:39 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.ardour.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 27 Jun 2021 22:07:02 -0500 "Chris Caudle" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, June 27, 2021 8:09 pm, Matt Keys wrote: > > I've asked in other forums without success. > > Have you tried Hydrogen Audio? Those guys have done a lot of > listening tests. > Have you checked the opus information direct from the web site? > This page has a comparison that shows opus at 96k is high quality, but > still perceptible: > https://opus-codec.org/comparison/ > > Latency seems to be in the 5ms-20ms range for high bit rate opus. > > > I'm trying to understand which is better for tx/rx of highest > > quality and lowest latency audio to multple remote peers - > > uncompressed audio > > How remote? If on a LAN you control then multicast uncompressed is > both highest quality and lowest latency. > > > example jacktrrip 2 channel 48k / 128 frames), or something like > > opus at 48k 2 channel (for example webrtc using opus)? > > The network protocol built into jackd can use opus (well, celt, the > immediate precursor to opus); you could start with that, compare > uncompressed and compressed using netjack1. > https://jackaudio.org/faq/netjack.html > > > My focus is within a controlled > > environment like a flat wired or optical 1g or 10g ethernet. > > That isn't what I would consider remote. Just use uncompressed audio, > anything else is just adding latency and reducing audio quality for no > reason. > > > Does the use of opus (and a sip stack/webrtc) add latency overall > > Yes > > > there efficiency gains (for example network bandwidth reduction) > > through its use? > > Why do you care about network efficiency on a 10Gb or even 1Gb > network in a flat? You can carry something like 500 channels of > uncompressed audio on a 1Gb network. At 48k sampling that is > 48k*4bytes = 192k bytes/second = 1.55-ish Mbits/second per channel. > Even with overhead of packet headers you can get hundreds of channels > into 1000Mb/s Ethernet. > > > Could this difference, if any, be measured using jack_iodelay? > > Yes, as pointed out above you can just use jackd with netjack1 and > switch between uncompressed and compressed audio. > But you should only do that for the educational value, if you just > want to get audio work done just load up zita-j2n and get going, > messing around with opus on a LAN doesn't make sense. > +1 _______________________________________________ Ardour-Users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or change your mailing preferences please visit: http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org