Re: Why bother with lossy encoding?
Stephane Ascoet <[email protected]> Wed, 8 Mar 2017 10:53:14 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.audacity.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Universite Pantheon-Sorbonne |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le 07/03/2017 00:29, Clyde Lyman a écrit : > I poked around and found that mp3's at 128kbps sound like radio and 160kbps sound like CD. Now if that's true then even in the 1970's you could get an astonishing amount of fidelity out Hi, I've always been bothered by such comparaisons since they are not accurate, only very approximative. Sound annoyances between each of the above cases are very different. In a general thought, analog and digital can't be compared easily because they are so much different -- Bien cordialement, Stephane Ascoet ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Announcing the Oxford Dictionaries API! The API offers world-renowned dictionary content that is easy and intuitive to access. Sign up for an account today to start using our lexical data to power your apps and projects. Get started today and enter our developer competition. http://sdm.link/oxford *********** ASKING FOR HELP ************* When asking for help on this list, please include the following information, so we can help you properly: * What operating system you are using (for example, Windows XP or Mac OS X 10.5.1) * Exactly what three digit version number of Audacity you are using (Help > About Audacity, or Audacity > About Audacity on a Mac computer) * If this is a recording problem, what equipment you are recording with, and how is it connected to the computer? Mailing list: [email protected] To UNSUBSCRIBE, use the form at the bottom of this web page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-users