Re: Why bother with lossy encoding?
Billy Geiger <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:21:24 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.audacity.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEj6UUcLwvRnyxUoQ5c4YKTNs6NZKq2n2=SgbV5OU9wyYW39Dw@mail.gmail.com> |
hhhmmmmmmmm.... Use Audacity to interject a few DBs of low-end bass.... [email protected] Billy Geiger Winder, GA. (40 miles east of Atlanta) On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Roger <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:59:31AM +0100, Stephane Ascoet wrote: > >Le 09/03/2017 21:59, Johnny Rosenberg a ?crit : > >> After listening to lossy formats I found that the result depends a lot > on > >> the original sound. If the original sound is a poor noisy old recording > >> from the 60's or even earlier, not even 256 kb/s (mp3) is enough to > avoid > >> audible artefacts. A good original however, may sound good enough at 160 > >> kb/s (mp3). With Ogg/Vorbis files at least one step lower bitrate may be > >> ok. Hiss sounds seems to be very tricky to handle for those psycho > acoustic > >> data reducing algorithms. > > > >Yes it seems we are so different because for me the most important is > >the "emotion" I get, so I like a good LP or tape but get bored by most > >digital sound, except good DSD or PCM played with high-end audiophilic > DAC. > > Ditto here, as I consider myself to have good ears for classical music. > > Extracted all of my CD's into PCM WAV avoiding the lossy compression > codecs, > but still noticing the metallic/tin type sound reminiscent of CD grade > audio, > even with a 5.1 home stereo grade DAC. I seem to prefer the 24-bit 48kHz > sampling, but am no where near being rich to upgrade my entire music > collection. Can still recall the days of Tape and LP, where music was less > tinny sounding. But then that's also getting back to the days where tubes > were > also more common. > > I've also tried upsampling the CD audio to 24-bit 48kHz sampling, while > using > an ALSA LP filter, helps but not significantly enough. Shrugs, maybe my > ears > are just getting too old and too tired. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > *********** ASKING FOR HELP ************* > > When asking for help on this list, please include the following > information, so we can > help you properly: > > * What operating system you are using (for example, Windows XP or Mac OS X > 10.5.1) > > * Exactly what three digit version number of Audacity you are using (Help > > About > Audacity, or Audacity > About Audacity on a Mac computer) > > * If this is a recording problem, what equipment you are recording with, > and how is it > connected to the computer? > > Mailing list: [email protected] > To UNSUBSCRIBE, use the form at the bottom of this web page: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot *********** ASKING FOR HELP ************* When asking for help on this list, please include the following information, so we can help you properly: * What operating system you are using (for example, Windows XP or Mac OS X 10.5.1) * Exactly what three digit version number of Audacity you are using (Help > About Audacity, or Audacity > About Audacity on a Mac computer) * If this is a recording problem, what equipment you are recording with, and how is it connected to the computer? Mailing list: [email protected] To UNSUBSCRIBE, use the form at the bottom of this web page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-users