RE: Mono
"Sibbald, Alister" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.cd-paranoia.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <356AA740D3CED511874800508BCF30D702EBB9A8@EXCRSLAVINGT001> |
A very good point Dave. I agree. I suppose the problem this leaves Boris with is to work out which of these three options it is. Maybe, to paraphrase what someone said, the best approach is "if it sounds OK, it is OK". If it is truly caused in the manner you suggest, the way to fix it would be to do what a mono switch on an amplifier does, and simply to average the two channels together and write out the averaged signal ot both channels. However, if it already sounds OK, this seems a little unnecessary. Regards Alister -----Original Message----- From: Dave Lewis [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 23 September 2003 14:44 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [paranoia] Mono >I'm not sure that's right Jack. >If the programme material is Mono, then by definition both channels >must be identical. It is either a historical recording, which came >from a single track mono tape, or a more modern mix-down to mono, >which results in the same thing ( although I'm not sure why anyone >would want to do the latter ). > >Either way, if the source was a single mono channel, the CD creation >process should simply have duplicated that Mono channel on both Left >and Right. > >Therefore, if Boris is getting different data, I can only see two >possibilities: > >1 The CD is simply mis-labelled and is not in fact Mono. In other >words, Paranoia is doing it's job correctly, but the source data >really is different. I can't see there is much potential for this. >CD Publishers are unlikely to label something Mono unless they >really have to, for obvious marketing reasons. > >2 The CD is Mono, but Paranoia is not correcting all errors. It may >for example be interpolating over errors in one channel but not >having to interpolate over errors at the same point in the other >channel. A third possibility is that an analog mono source was fed into both channels of the mastering digitizer. HIGHLY unlikely that both channels would produce identical digital data no matter how carefully the inputs were matched. Since this seems to be the simplest way to master a mono CD, I think it's the most probable explanation. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Paranoia homepage: http://www.xiph.org/paranoia/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to '[email protected]' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail is intended only for the above addressee. It may contain privileged information. If you are not the addressee you must not copy, distribute, disclose or use any of the information in it. If you have received it in error please delete it and immediately notify the sender. evolvebank.com is a division of Lloyds TSB Bank plc. Lloyds TSB Bank plc, 25 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7HN. Registered in England, number 2065. Telephone No: 020 7626 1500 Lloyds TSB Scotland plc, Henry Duncan House, 120 George Street, Edinburgh EH2 4LH. Registered in Scotland, number 95237. Telephone No: 0131 225 4555 Lloyds TSB Bank plc and Lloyds TSB Scotland plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and represent only the Scottish Widows and Lloyds TSB Marketing Group for life assurance, pensions and investment business. Signatories to the Banking Codes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------