Re: CD Ripping Uncertainty Principle?
"Nils Chr. Framstad" <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:01:06 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.cd-paranoia.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Monty wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 12:04:05PM -0500, Alec Wood wrote:
> > At this point I have no idea how common this sort of thing is. I've
> > only tested one CD (a commercial one) and it only has this one problem
> > area maybe a second long or so. Maybe lots of CDs do this, maybe it's
> > quite rare. I have no idea.
>
> In the average mass produced audio CD, you generally have a
> substantial number of errors that get through the two layers of
> correcton used on an audio disc. This is considered acceptible in the
> industry as they're usually not audible.
An (obviously) uneducated question from me, then: where does the
_randomness_ occur? Is it
- the bits? E.g. the CD has bits with values so close to 1/2 that
Heisenberg, God and Kolmogorov (please delete as appropriate)
sometimes outputs 0, sometimes 1, for any reasonable CD-player?
- the physics of the spinner? If software requests a re-read, and you
basically don't know where you bounce into the groove, you get
different sets of samples at each rip?
- a combination?
- something else?
What puzzles me also is that cdparanoia does not report the error. Is
it so that all those errors are re-read until they by coincidence pass
the error corrections, and then cdparanoia is satisfied and cannot
tell the difference between a correct sample and a erroneous which by
coincidence looks right on the nth read?
--
mailto:[email protected]
"Terrorists believe that anything goes in the name of their cause.
The fight against terror must not buy into that logic."
-- Human Rights Watch: <URL:http://hrw.org/press/2002/01/wr2002.htm>