what difference xorriso is it going to make on the user interface?

Zhang Weiwu maintains CDRBQ <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.cd-record
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello.

Having heard a new release of xorriso I am thinking of moving my project 
(cdrbq.sf.net) to base on xorriso. If you imagine the difference between 
xorriso and older utilities, what do you think is the main difference 
that can be reflected on the user experience? That is, what difference 
does it make if a desktop DVD burning application make use of xorriso 
that it can offer a unique feature or competition advantage over others?

I can think of one answer, but there are probably much more. One answer 
would be xorriso offers much better control on multi-session 
manipulation. There may be use-cases where users want to have removable 
storage that stores like layers, that you can always recover an older 
version of something, or "portable version management and backup system 
in one". Can you think of a few example of such use cases? I can imagine 
one but there are probably much more. One might be the contracted 
photographer shoots a lot of photos and burn them on DVD, and do a 
second round of processing to delete unwanted ones before delivering to 
customer. Had the customer wanted a deleted photo because she changed 
her mind, with manual-instruction they can recover from previous 
sessions. Photographers don't keep the deleted photos, customer do, thus 
rule out copyright and privacy concern. Do this scenario happen in your 
country?

Best regards
Zhang Weiwu

-- 
CDRBQ - desktop application for optical disc
		authoring / recording / burning

Written in TCL/TK, usable for Windows, Linux and similar systems.

http://cdrbq.sourceforge.net/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.