Re: libFLAC optimizations request
Erik de Castro Lopo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.compression.flac.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Erik Conspiracy Secret Labs |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Gabriel Corneanu wrote: > > Probably easiest as as PR against: > > > > https://github.com/xiph/flac/ > > I create a PR. > The existing API should not have been changed, all tests are passed. Thanks. Will look at this on the weekend. > > You can probably avoid it by using the library directly instead of using > > the flac command line program. > > It is the other way around :) . > I could NOT avoid generating the comment with the library. > Even after my change, the command line tool is still generating it (I > don't really mind). > My proposal is to not generate it by default (with libFLAC) for a > non-ogg target. Hmm, I'm a little wary of changing the behaviour after FLAC has be in the wild and widely used. I'll take a look at other options when I look at the PR. Cheers, Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev