FLAC: weak encoding looks good
[email protected] Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:19:46 +0100 (CET)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.compression.flac.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <626694546.1644881236683986088.JavaMail.root@spooler8-g27.priv.proxad.net> |
Hello, Yesterday, i realized that file sizes obtained from the pre-defined compression settings (-0 to -8) were rather tight. For the sake of curiosity, i also tried even lower "rice partition orders": "-l0 -r1" and even "-l0 -r0". and i was surprised to realize the file obtained was smaller than the one obtained with pre-defined setting "-0". I dont know what's behind "-r0" and even if that value does make sense (was it really the value used) ?! Also, i wonder what are the effects of (-b): what are the pros and cons of raising/lowering the value of 'b' ? Does this mean that more/less samples are interpolated by some fixed function ? Phil