Re: flac -- exhaustive model search vs. -A <*>?

Linda Walsh wrote:
>
>
> If that's the case then the highest -l value one can 'portably' use would
> be 12?  FWIW, I've tried 16 & 12 and noticed no difference in 
> exhaustive's
> execution time.
====
Something that just occurred to me -- it "may" be the case that the -l 
value
can, at most, use 1 parameter per/bit of the data block size.
Since 44.1KHz, songs use a 4096 blocksize, it just so happens that's 
2^12, so more bits in -l at best would do no good, and at worst, might 
take more space for unused bits. (i.e. 16 might cost .5 bytes/4096 block)...

_______________________________________________
Flac mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac