Re: 1.21 vs 1.3 encoding speed

--===============2102711460==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c29502677c1a04ff0305ee

--001a11c29502677c1a04ff0305ee
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I will post to the dev list, sorry about that.

To give an idea, though, at flac level 8:

24/96 wav file
1.21: 61.05 seconds. ratio=0.690
1.3: 222.48 seconds. ratio=0.690

smaller 16/44.1 wav file
1.21: 14.28 seconds. ratio=0.487
1.3: 51.21 seconds. ratio=0.487

Scott


On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:39 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Are you sure they didn't change the default encoding level ?
>
> I would include some example timings to give a better idea of what
> "significantly slower" is
>
> Wonder if you see same for 44/16 files?
>
> On Jul 25, 2014, at 2:29 AM, Martijn van Beurden <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> You might want to report this to the flac-dev mailinglist instead of the
> flac (users) list.
>
> op 24-07-14 22:02, Scott Brown schreef:
>
>   Hello,
>
>  I'm on a Mac and I'm noticing that encoding via the flac command line is
> significantly slower with version 1.3.0 than 1.2.1. I'm encoding a 24/96
> file to flac, both from wav and aiff and both formats are showing the same
> speed decrease when using 1.3.0.
>
>  Also, 1.2.1 will not encode an aiff-c file, but 1.3.0 will. Is this
> change documented anywhere?
>
>  Thanks,
> Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flac mailing [email protected]://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flac mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flac mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
>
>

--001a11c29502677c1a04ff0305ee
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<div dir="ltr"><div>I will post to the dev list, sorry about that.<br><br>To give an idea, though, at flac level 8:<br><br></div><div>24/96 wav file<br></div><div>1.21: 61.05 seconds. ratio=0.690<br></div><div>1.3: 222.48 seconds. ratio=0.690<br>

</div><div><br></div><div>smaller 16/44.1 wav file<br></div><div>1.21: 14.28 seconds. ratio=0.487<br></div><div>1.3: 51.21 seconds. ratio=0.487<br><br></div>Scott<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">

On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:39 AM,  <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank">[email protected]</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

<div dir="auto"><div>Are you sure they didn&#39;t change the default encoding level ?</div><div><br></div><div>I would include some example timings to give a better idea of what &quot;significantly slower&quot; is</div><div>

<br></div><div>Wonder if you see same for 44/16 files?</div><div><div class="h5"><div><br>On Jul 25, 2014, at 2:29 AM, Martijn van Beurden &lt;<a href="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank">[email protected]</a>&gt; wrote:<br>

<br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
  
    
  
  
    Hi,<br>
    <br>
    You might want to report this to the flac-dev mailinglist instead of
    the flac (users) list.<br>
    <br>
    <div>op 24-07-14 22:02, Scott Brown schreef:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>Hello,<br>
              <br>
            </div>
            I&#39;m on a Mac and I&#39;m noticing that encoding via the flac
            command line is significantly slower with version 1.3.0 than
            1.2.1. I&#39;m encoding a 24/96 file to flac, both from wav and
            aiff and both formats are showing the same speed decrease
            when using 1.3.0.<br>
            <br>
          </div>
          Also, 1.2.1 will not encode an aiff-c file, but 1.3.0 will. Is
          this change documented anywhere?<br>
          <br>
        </div>
        Thanks,<br>
        Scott<br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre>_______________________________________________
Flac mailing list
<a href="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank">[email protected]</a>
<a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac" target="_blank">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  

</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Flac mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank">[email protected]</a></span><br>

<span><a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac" target="_blank">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac</a></span><br></div></blockquote></div></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>


Flac mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac" target="_blank">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a11c29502677c1a04ff0305ee--

--===============2102711460==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Flac mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac

--===============2102711460==--