Re: Acoustic echo cancellation
Arun Raghavan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.compression.speex.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1308681554.4503.145.camel@snowflake> |
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 20:18 +0200, Kadinger András wrote: > 2011.06.21. 19:22 keltezéssel, Arun Raghavan írta: > > Hi Andras, others, > > > > Andras Kadinger<bandit<at> surfnonstop.com> writes: > >> > >> Daniel, > >> I recommend you to start from a simple case and gradually progress > >> towards your goal. > >> Can you make things work with the "Speex in a Disco" (Example 6) > >> testcase at http://ns.surfnonstop.com/~bandit/speex/echocard1/ ? > >> These files were captured via a stereo soundcard, so the channel > >> sample clocks are exactly synchronized, making for a simple baseline > >> testcase for AEC. > > I'm trying to run current speex with your test program on these samples, > > and while the quality is quite nice, it's not nearly as good as the > > samples on that site. I tried to bisect git back to the SVN commits > > mentioned there, but I get about the same results. Am I missing > > something? > Hi Arun, > > As far as I know the AEC algorithm should be deterministic - if you run > the same code, with the same settings, giving the same input, you should > be getting the same output. > > You seem to have made sure the issue is not dependent on version of > Speex (source code), you said you use my testprogram (same source code, > same settings) and my samples (same input). > > Difference could also be caused by differences in the translation from > source code to machine code. These differences could be caused by the > toolchain (e.g. compiler version); or they could be platform-specific > differences: differences in math architecture (e.g. integer vs floating > point math, precision of math, math bugs), or a different set of > platform-specific codeparts getting activated within the Speex source > (which no longer guarantees you and I were actually running the same > code, so could be a source of the difference). Indeed. I was curious to know if you or anyone else is seeing these differences as well. > The samples were created in 2006 on x86/Linux Gentoo (sorry, I cannot > recall the compiler versions anymore). > > If you are trying on a different architecture, maybe try it on x86 too, > to see whether the issue is triggered by the different platform, and > then we have a starting point. I'm also running this on x86 (x86_64, technically), and it's all floating-point, so I guess this is a regression somewhere. Will try to see if I can run it without any optimisations if possible, which I assume should serve as an adequate reference. Cheers, Arun _______________________________________________ Speex-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev