Re: Acoustic echo cancellation

Speaking of AEC (thought not quite on topic for this thread),

Has anyone on this list played with the GIPS code that google just
open-sourced?  It looks like their AEC also has code to handle differential
sample rates, though I haven't really evaluated it thoroughly.

There is really a lot of code in the drop ‹ basically all of the GIPS DSP
stuff (AGC, VAD, Denoise, echo canceller, etc), their transport layer,
hardware access (audio/video capture), etc.  It's all wrapped up to be part
of a javascript API in the browser, but it seems like the individual
components are useable without the rest.

https://sites.google.com/site/webrtc/

-SteveK


From:  Steve Underwood <[email protected]>
Date:  Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:05:16 +0800
To:  <[email protected]>
Subject:  Re: [Speex-dev] Acoustic echo cancellation

> On 06/22/2011 04:57 AM, Arun Raghavan wrote:
>>  On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 11:39 -0700, Arun Raghavan wrote:
>>  [...]
>>>  I'm also running this on x86 (x86_64, technically), and it's all
>>>  floating-point, so I guess this is a regression somewhere. Will try to
>>>  see if I can run it without any optimisations if possible, which I
>>>  assume should serve as an adequate reference.
>>  Surprisingly, if I use -O0 instead of -O2, I see a difference in the
>>  output. Nothing very observable in Audacity, but the actual output
>>  definitely differs.
> If you use a floating point build the output is likely to change with
> the optimisation level selected, the compiler version, and maybe even
> the day of the week :-)
> 
>>  Still trying to figure out why they're both so different from your run
>>  from 5 years ago, though.
> Steve
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speex-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
>

_______________________________________________
Speex-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev