回复: (no subject)

"烂馍馍." <[email protected]> Tue, 6 Dec 2011 12:56:27 +0800
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.compression.speex.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
yes, you are right.but its not one instance of codec.
 
 
------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "Jean-Marc Valin"<[email protected]>;
发送时间: 2011年12月6日(星期二) 中午12:52
收件人: "speex-dev"<[email protected]>; 

主题: Re: [Speex-dev] (no subject)

 
Actually, it *is* thread safe as long as you don't use the *same* state
at the same time from two calls. i.e. you can easily encode two
different streams from two different threads.

	Jean-Marc

On 11-12-01 04:55 AM, 烂馍馍. wrote:
> it.s not safe.
>  
>  
> ------------------ Original ------------------
> *From: * "Денис Ромашенко"<[email protected]>;
> *Date: * Thu, Dec 1, 2011 04:43 PM
> *To: * "speex-dev"<[email protected]>;
> *Subject: * [Speex-dev] (no subject)
>  
> Hi.
>  Is the speexlib thread safe?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speex-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speex-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
_______________________________________________
Speex-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev

_______________________________________________
Speex-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev