Re: Decoding only a certain frame results in different values than when decoding the entire file

Clearly, it must be the previous frames. 

-- 
Steve Checkoway



On Dec 23, 2011, at 14:32, Hermann Weber <[email protected]> wrote:

> When I already decoded something, and the decstate is not erased or 
> reset, shouldn't that be sufficient to decode other frames with a good 
> quality?
> 
> For example, when I have decoded 30 frames without decoding the previous 
> frames, the sound quality may not be too good, but afterwards the 
> decoder should (in my opinion) be in a "good" state.
> But when I decode other frames afterwards, it is as if I did not decode 
> anything before...
> Can someone explain this?
> 
> Does the decoder need to have decoded the adjacent previous frames or is 
> it sufficient that the decoder has just decoded anything?
> 
> Thank you.
> Hermann
> 
> 
> Am 23.12.2011 20:49, schrieb Hermann Weber:
>> My file is 3 hours long, so decoding takes around 5 minutes on an
>> average computer.
>> That is a bit too long unfortunately...
>> 
>> 
>> Am 23.12.2011 20:38, schrieb Steve Checkoway:
>>> On Dec 23, 2011, at 10:54, Hermann Weber<[email protected]>   wrote:
>>> 
>>>> And how many frames does Speex need to "recover"?
>>>> Or is that not predictable?
>>> No idea. My guess is not predictable. You have all of the data, why not decode it all?
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Speex-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speex-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
>