Re: Upsampling while decoding / Updating
Hermann Weber <[email protected]> Tue, 07 May 2013 21:12:40 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.compression.speex.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear Nikos, thank you very much for your advice! I am not a little bit new to C++, and experiments (like using another third party library) always turn out to be days of work for me. That is why I would first like to try Speex's new internal resampling function. I am currently still using the old 1.0.4 version. I have now downloaded the new 1.2rc1 version. Unfortunately it does not want to compile the libspeex.dll right away, VS2010 tells me: Converting project file 'C:\Users\MyUser\Desktop\speex-1.2rc1\win32\VS2008\libspeex\libspeex.vcproj'. Failed to upgrade platform 'Windows Mobile 5.0 Pocket PC SDK (ARMV4I)'. Please make sure you have it installed under '%vctargetspath%\platforms\Windows Mobile 5.0 Pocket PC SDK (ARMV4I)' VCWebServiceProxyGeneratorTool is no longer supported. The tool has been removed from your project settings. Failed to upgrade 'Debug|Windows Mobile 5.0 Pocket PC SDK (ARMV4I)'. Please make sure you have the corresponding platform installed under '%vctargetspath%\platforms\Windows Mobile 5.0 Pocket PC SDK (ARMV4I)' The project configuration dimension name/value "(Platform, Win32)" was not found in the project manifest. Is it possible to compile the libspeex.dll without support for Windows Mobile 5.0, or is there no other way? I am afraid of messing anything up by install it. Greetings! Hermie Am 07.05.2013 16:03, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: > On 07/05/13 13:07, Hermann Weber wrote: >> Hello! >> >> I would like to know if it is possible to request encoding to a higher >> samplerate than the original data. >> For example my uncompressed data was 22 kHz, and I would now like to >> decode the compressed data to 48 kHz (to feed it to a filter which >> expects a high "input" format). >> Is this possible with Speex? > Speex comes with a resampler, so yes. You need to resample your signal > after decoding it. > > However, I'd recommend using the Opus resampler instead of the Speex > one. (It can be used stand-alone and directly included in your own code.) > > _______________________________________________ > Speex-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev >