Re: Upsampling while decoding / Updating
Hermann Weber <[email protected]> Wed, 08 May 2013 18:24:34 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.compression.speex.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear Nikos, thank you very much for the help! I have just played around with Opus some more, and it is amazing!! Again, THANK YOU for pointing me at it! Hermie Am 08.05.2013 18:18, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: > I'm not using Opus at all. I'm just including its resampler in my own > sources. It's not even a DLL; it's directly compiled together with the > rest of my code. You need these sources from the opus-tools package > (http://www.opus-codec.org/downloads/): > > arch.h resample.c resample_sse.h speex_resampler.h stack_alloc.h > > In your project file, define these macros: > > #define SPX_RESAMPLE_EXPORT > #define OUTSIDE_SPEEX > #define RANDOM_PREFIX NAME_OF_YOUR_SOFTWARE > > If your software is actually a library itself, you might to instead: > > #define SPX_RESAMPLE_EXPORT __declspec(dllexport) > > or whatever else you happen to be using. > > With that, you should be able to include the source files directly in > your project and build them without issues. The license is a two clause > BSD-style permissive one, so you can do that. > > > On 08/05/13 07:38, Hermann Weber wrote: >> Dear Nikos, >> >> thanks! >> But you use Opus only for resampling, not for entirely replacing Speex, >> don't you? >> >> Greetings! >> Hermie >> >> Am 07.05.2013 22:53, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: >>> The Opus resampler is actually a bugfixed version of the Speex one. Same >>> interface/API, but with the bugs removed. It's why I recommended it :-) >>> Otherwise I would have recommended something entirely different, like >>> SoXR. >>> >>> >>> On 07/05/13 22:12, Hermann Weber wrote: >>>> Dear Nikos, >>>> >>>> thank you very much for your advice! >>>> >>>> I am not a little bit new to C++, and experiments (like using another >>>> third party library) always turn out to be days of work for me. >>>> That is why I would first like to try Speex's new internal resampling >>>> function. >>>> >>>> I am currently still using the old 1.0.4 version. >>>> >>>> I have now downloaded the new 1.2rc1 version. >>>> Unfortunately it does not want to compile the libspeex.dll right away, >>>> VS2010 tells me: >>>> >>>> Converting project file >>>> 'C:\Users\MyUser\Desktop\speex-1.2rc1\win32\VS2008\libspeex\libspeex.vcproj'. >>>> >>>> Failed to upgrade platform 'Windows Mobile 5.0 Pocket PC SDK (ARMV4I)'. >>>> Please make sure you have it installed under >>>> '%vctargetspath%\platforms\Windows Mobile 5.0 Pocket PC SDK (ARMV4I)' >>>> VCWebServiceProxyGeneratorTool is no longer supported. The tool has been >>>> removed from your project settings. >>>> Failed to upgrade 'Debug|Windows Mobile 5.0 Pocket PC SDK (ARMV4I)'. >>>> Please make sure you have the corresponding platform installed under >>>> '%vctargetspath%\platforms\Windows Mobile 5.0 Pocket PC SDK (ARMV4I)' >>>> The project configuration dimension name/value "(Platform, Win32)" was >>>> not found in the project manifest. >>>> >>>> Is it possible to compile the libspeex.dll without support for Windows >>>> Mobile 5.0, or is there no other way? >>>> I am afraid of messing anything up by install it. >>>> >>>> Greetings! >>>> Hermie >>>> >>>> Am 07.05.2013 16:03, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: >>>>> On 07/05/13 13:07, Hermann Weber wrote: >>>>>> Hello! >>>>>> >>>>>> I would like to know if it is possible to request encoding to a higher >>>>>> samplerate than the original data. >>>>>> For example my uncompressed data was 22 kHz, and I would now like to >>>>>> decode the compressed data to 48 kHz (to feed it to a filter which >>>>>> expects a high "input" format). >>>>>> Is this possible with Speex? >>>>> Speex comes with a resampler, so yes. You need to resample your signal >>>>> after decoding it. >>>>> >>>>> However, I'd recommend using the Opus resampler instead of the Speex >>>>> one. (It can be used stand-alone and directly included in your own code.) > > _______________________________________________ > Speex-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev >