Re: Speex on M3 for a device for a disabled person to use

On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:28 PM, René Schümann <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hi Tristan,
>
> well... if speed is really his problem (and looking at those 72 MHz it
> probably is), wouldn't Speek surpass Opus by far?
> I agree that Opus is way better, but it's sadly also using more
> resources...
>
> But yeah,  Richard you should give Opus a try if possible ;) It's
> generally easier to use then Speex and also more feature rich.
>

Yes, I forgot to mention that caveat:

https://wiki.xiph.org/OpusFAQ#Opus_is_using_too_much_CPU_for_my_application._What_can_I_do.3F

Best,
Tristan

*From:* Tristan Matthews <[email protected]>
<%3Ca%[email protected]%3C/a%3E>
*Sent:* Thu, 9 Oct 2014 13:20:44 -0400 - *To:* Richard Sloan
<[email protected]> <%3Ca%[email protected]%3C/a%3E>
*CC:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [Speex-dev] Speex on M3 for a device for a disabled person
to use


>  Hi Richard,
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Richard Sloan <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>  I am trying to develop a device for a disabled person and need low
>> bitrate voice, speex looks good, however I need to find optimized M3 code
>> and can not, searched online all over, I use Keil also if that helps.
>>
>> My M3 is 128kbps/64kram 72mhz, i only need to do a encode in one part and
>> decode in another.....
>>
>>  Please let me know if you can help this project with a link to optimized
>> code
>>
>
>  For new projects, we recommend using the Opus Codec (
> http://www.opus-codec.org/) which has effectively obsoleted Speex.
>
> Best,
> Tristan
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speex-dev mailing [email protected]://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speex-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
>
>

_______________________________________________
Speex-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev