Re: [Csnd-dev] [EXTERNAL] [Csnd-dev] restore develop as default branch?

BTW: the only big issue that concerns me is the parsing of complex
expressions. It seems that precedence is not correct somewhere. I've
noticed this while live coding where I tend to do a lot of
calculations as expressions and noticed different results with CS7 vs.
CS6. CS7 has otherwise worked well.

On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 12:44 PM Victor Lazzarini
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Ok, I created a PR updating the README text to support the change.
>
> https://github.com/csound/csound/pull/1895
>
> I think we are all in agreement, so as soon as the PR is merged, we
> can go ahead and make the change.
> ========================
> Prof. Victor Lazzarini
> Maynooth University
> Ireland
>
> > On 11 Jun 2024, at 13:36, Steven Yi <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > *Warning*
> >
> > This email originated from outside of Maynooth University's Mail System. Do not reply, click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe.
> >
> > I'm in favor of this. We can add a note to the README.md that develop
> > has major revisions and is still undergoing change and fixes. We can
> > additionally point people to the csound6 branch for stable code if
> > necessary.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 5:45 AM Victor Lazzarini
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I am just wondering now, in view of our final push to have 7.0 released September, should we restore the develop
> >> branch as default?
> >>
> >> My reasoning is:
> >>
> >> - The current master as 6.18 is getting a bit old. Not sure we should invest any efforts in making a 6.19 to
> >> refresh it, as our time is limited and we have to concentrate on 7.0.
> >>
> >> - There’s sometimes confusion for submitting PRs as they go to the default branch and need to be edited.
> >> Also when pulling, the default branch is what comes up, people might start working on changes to it without
> >> realising it is a dead end.
> >>
> >> - The develop branch is fairly stable now, particularly as we can’t commit directly to it and the code there
> >> is fully reviewed.
> >>
> >> - Foregrounding 7.0 as the way forward is a good idea.
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >> ========================
> >> Prof. Victor Lazzarini
> >> Maynooth University
> >> Ireland
> >>
>