Re: [Csnd-dev] Wasm build concerns

Steven Yi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.csound.devel
Message-ID <CANtcCs5o_hkC-kzZZUX+sFA6CY1vgsAXRkyBW7Xv0EonRRcbhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Yes this is a concern and it's a known issue we need to modernize the wasm
build. Unfortunately Hlodver isn't available much currently and I've been
stuck spending a lot of time on PR reviews that I haven't had much time to
do feature work. Ideally we'd move the nix build to use cmake.

I pushed a fix for now to that PR. I also added a comment about major,
minor, patch. I think we should remove APIVERSION (or now CS_APIVERSION and
CS_APISUBVER) and just stick to semantic versioning practices (
https://semver.org/) for major, minor, patch.



On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 4:02 AM Victor Lazzarini <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I am becoming concerned that the current way WASI binaries are built is
> problematic in that changes
> we make to CMakeLists.txt may not be picked up. Since not all of us have
> the full Wasm build at hand,
> it can cause difficulties and slow down development.
>
> For example, I put a PR (#1984) to fix the CS_APIVERSION etc issue and I
> made a change to the
> header source (version.h.in) and CMakeLists.txt. This was not picked up
> in the Wasm build and I
> don’t have the means to fix it myself.
>
> This also raises the concern that keeping two build systems in sync is
> maybe something we can’t
> afford with so few active developers.
>
> ========================
> Prof. Victor Lazzarini
> Maynooth University
> Ireland
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.