Re: [Csnd-dev] [EXTERNAL] [Csnd-dev] long-standing diskin/diskin2 issue
"Dr. Richard Boulanger" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.csound.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOH7dA76k8g2YjCoFNS+uVHN22HXgA=Rqn4gsCus4JswPg7dQw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hello Victor and Rory, The fixes are and will be important. Others have noticed 'curious' behaviours with the important and incredibly useful diskin family. And so, I super appreciate that you found this and are 'fixing' these. But maybe, you should create additional diskin opcodes so that 'nothing' breaks (diskinA1, diskinA2 or optional argument to the existing code) *- Dr.B* *Dr. Richard Boulanger* Professor Electronic Production and Design *Berklee College of Music* Professional Writing & Technology Division On Sat, Apr 12, 2025 at 5:41 AM Victor Lazzarini < [email protected]> wrote: > Well since no one answered earlier, I went with option 2, which wasn’t too > difficult to implement and also > it allowed me to fix the “inconsistent channels” init error which always > bugged me as a half-assed implementation. > > https://github.com/csound/csound/pull/2128 > > I think both would solutions could potentially break code. Solution 2 > won’t make anyone’s code fail like > solution 1. It’s also possible to implement solution 1 on top of this > (it’s independent of my fix). > > ======================== > Prof. Victor Lazzarini > Maynooth University > Ireland > > > On 12 Apr 2025, at 10:25, Rory Walsh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > *Warning* > > This email originated from outside of Maynooth University's Mail System. > Do not reply, click links or open attachments unless you recognise the > sender and know the content is safe. > > I think option 1 is the best, even though there is a chance that this > will break existing instruments. > > > > On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 10:58, Victor Lazzarini < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > some advice needed here. > > While marking some student work, I came across an issue in > diskin/diskin2 that seems to be long standing > > and maybe someone might have come across this and dismissed it. > > > > The code I was looking at was reading a stereo file peaking near 0dbfs, > but the output from diskin was > > double that (and so causing samples out of range). After several checks, > I figured the problem was > > with diskin. Then I noticed the code was using the same variable for > left and right > > > > asig, asig diskin … > > > > so I went to look at the sources and saw that diskin does some summing > to these variables as > > part of its process. Normally, you would think that it would just > overwrite them, but it is > > actually using them for some internal buffering. The result is that if > the same variable is used, > > we get the strange effect of the two file channels being mixed up (and > possibly other effects depending > > on diskin/diskin2 parameters). > > > > So I am in two minds about this: > > > > 1 - it is user error: we should throw an init error. > > > > 2 - it is not user error and diskin is not behaving properly. > > > > I don’t actually like the fact the opcode uses the output variable for > buffering, but we probably have > > similar cases elsewhere. The simplest thing is to treat it as 1 and > document it in the manual. > > Interestingly it is a similar issue I have encountered with > pass-by-reference UDOs > > (see https://github.com/csound/csound/issues/2061) > > > > What do you think? > > ======================== > > Prof. Victor Lazzarini > > Maynooth University > > Ireland > > > >