[Csnd-dev] Parallel Csound performance
Victor Lazzarini <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Oct 2025 22:08:31 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.csound.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I’m back investigating parallel Csound performance and it was interesting to see that Csound 7 is working well with it, in fact far better than 6.18. Running 1000 oscillator instrs for 60 secs I got these stats ksmps = 100 ----------- single thread: 3.9s 8 threads: 3.9s ksmps = 150 ---------- single thread: 3.5s 8 threads: 2.7s ksmps = 300 ---------- single thread: 3.2s 8 threads: 1.6s ksmps = 500 ---------- single thread: 3.2s 8 threads: 1.2s ksmps = 1000 ---------- single thread: 3.3s 8 threads: 0.8 In comparison with 6.18 the last test ran at 11secs for 8 threads. In fact, 6.18 was always slower in parallel performance. Something was very broken there. Single-threaded performance is on a par with Csound 7. I can only think the new parser is working better with the parallel dispatch, or that something else was wrong in the 6.x and got fixed in 7. Anyway, I am pleased with these results. In general, ksmps=100 seems to be the break even point, below that multi-threaded performance is always losing. Also ksmps=1000 is more or less the highest gain, with diminishing returns after that. In my computer, 8 threads seem to be the optimal. best ======================== Prof. Victor Lazzarini Maynooth University Ireland