Re: Planet Vs Agnula, was Linux 2.6 Kernel etc
Brian Redfern <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.csound.tekno |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
For Csound they work about the same,CCRMA has more applications than Agnula, but its really about personal prefs, I found that Debian was too difficult to get working on my laptop, so I opted for Fedora, but I run both and I'd say they're about equally decent. On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Iain Duncan wrote: > Ok, this is all good to know. And I realize this more a question for a linux > users list, but I'm interested in answers from people for whom Csound is a > priority. If the goal is a stable, low latency, easy to install audio setup > that caters well to Csound, and one is wanting most of the dirty work done, > how do Planet CCRMA and Agnula stack up against each other? From what I > gather on their sites, they both include patched kernels and many audio apps > installed for you. I think both of these have the potential to really bring > new people to linux audio and csound. > > I'd really like to be able to use a Jack'd Csound as an automatable ( by > score or midi ) LADSPA plug-in in Ardour, that would be hella cool. > > Thanks, > Iain > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Brian Redfern" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:52 PM > Subject: Re: [CsndTek] Linux 2.6 Kernel, ALSA, and Varga Csound > > > > Well, logically it may seem that way, but the guys at stanford have done a > > wonderful job on CCRMA, back before Fedora I had a lot of problems getting > > CCRMA to work under redhat 8.0, and wound up doing my own from scratch > > setup, but in the end I'm a musician and don't want to spend all my free > > time patching and recompiling my kernel. Fedora doesn't have good audio > > support by itself, but when you install CCRMA on top of it, you get a ton > > of great software and everything sets itself up on Fedora seamlessly, even > > on a laptop. > > > > They're trying to push Enterprise Server to big organizations like Sony > > that need a commercial OS with support, and where they've come to expect > > and even demand per-seat liscensing. > > > > Fedora really seems stable enough to run a web or database server no > > problem, its just that if something goes wrong you have to figure it out > > for yourself. > > > > Enterprise is meant to do stuff like run Oracle databases, for linux audio > > systems you'd never want to run Redhat enterprise, CCRMA is only > > supporting Fedora going forward. > > > > > > > > On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Iain Duncan wrote: > > > > > Hmm, off the top of my head, that makes me a little more wary of RedHat > and > > > Fedora frankly. This may be totally unfounded, but it seems to me that > > > whenever an OS's goals are principally commercial, features that are > good > > > for audio are generally displaced by features that are good for security > and > > > general use. Am I off base here or have others noticed the same kind of > > > trend? Debian is strictly free both ways correct? ( Beer and libre . . > . ) > > > > > > Iain > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Kevin Conder" <[email protected]> > > > To: <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:35 PM > > > Subject: Re: [CsndTek] Linux 2.6 Kernel, ALSA, and Varga Csound > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Iain Duncan wrote: > > > > > > > > > What is fedora? > > > > > > > > From what I gather, RedHat has split their distro into an > > > > enterprise ($$$) and a community (aka hobbyist?) version. The > enterprise > > > > version is sold along with their support. Fedora is their community > > > > version (no charge, AFAIK) and doesn't come with any support. > > > > > > > > To avoid trademark restrictions on the community version, they > > > > changed the name to Fedora. More Fedora information is available here: > > > > http://fedora.redhat.com/ > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Kevin Conder, kevin-NPx+F0K3cJ/[email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > csoundtekno mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > Subscribe, unsubscribe, change mailing list options: > > > > http://plot.bek.no/mailman/listinfo/csoundtekno > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > csoundtekno mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > > > > Subscribe, unsubscribe, change mailing list options: > > > http://plot.bek.no/mailman/listinfo/csoundtekno > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > csoundtekno mailing list > > [email protected] > > > > Subscribe, unsubscribe, change mailing list options: > > http://plot.bek.no/mailman/listinfo/csoundtekno > > _______________________________________________ > csoundtekno mailing list > [email protected] > > Subscribe, unsubscribe, change mailing list options: > http://plot.bek.no/mailman/listinfo/csoundtekno > _______________________________________________ csoundtekno mailing list [email protected] Subscribe, unsubscribe, change mailing list options: http://plot.bek.no/mailman/listinfo/csoundtekno