Re: Planet Vs Agnula, was Linux 2.6 Kernel etc

Brian Redfern <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.csound.tekno
Message-ID <[email protected]>
For Csound they work about the same,CCRMA has more applications than
Agnula, but its really about personal prefs, I found that Debian was too
difficult to get working on my laptop, so I opted for Fedora, but I run
both and I'd say they're about equally decent.



On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Iain Duncan wrote:

> Ok, this is all good to know. And I realize this more a question for a linux
> users list, but I'm interested in answers from people for whom Csound is a
> priority. If the goal is a stable, low latency, easy to install audio setup
> that caters well to Csound, and one is wanting most of the dirty work done,
> how do Planet CCRMA and Agnula stack up against each other? From what I
> gather on their sites, they both include patched kernels and many audio apps
> installed for you. I think both of  these have the potential to really bring
> new people to linux audio and csound.
> 
> I'd really like to be able to use a Jack'd Csound as an automatable ( by
> score or midi ) LADSPA plug-in in Ardour, that would be hella cool.
> 
> Thanks,
> Iain
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian Redfern" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [CsndTek] Linux 2.6 Kernel, ALSA, and Varga Csound
> 
> 
> > Well, logically it may seem that way, but the guys at stanford have done a
> > wonderful job on CCRMA, back before Fedora I had a lot of problems getting
> > CCRMA to work under redhat 8.0, and wound up doing my own from scratch
> > setup, but in the end I'm a musician and don't want to spend all my free
> > time patching and  recompiling my kernel. Fedora doesn't have good audio
> > support by itself, but when you install CCRMA on top of it, you get a ton
> > of great software and everything sets itself up on Fedora seamlessly, even
> > on a laptop.
> >
> > They're trying to push Enterprise Server to big organizations like Sony
> > that need a commercial OS with support, and where they've come to expect
> > and even demand per-seat liscensing.
> >
> > Fedora really seems stable enough to run a web or database server no
> > problem, its just that if something goes wrong you have to figure it out
> > for yourself.
> >
> > Enterprise is meant to do stuff like run Oracle databases, for linux audio
> > systems you'd never want to run Redhat enterprise, CCRMA is only
> > supporting Fedora going forward.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >
> > > Hmm, off the top of my head, that makes me a little more wary of RedHat
> and
> > > Fedora frankly. This may be totally unfounded, but it seems to me that
> > > whenever an OS's goals are principally commercial, features that are
> good
> > > for audio are generally displaced by features that are good for security
> and
> > > general use. Am I off base here or have others noticed the same kind of
> > > trend? Debian is strictly free both ways correct? ( Beer and libre . .
> . )
> > >
> > > Iain
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Kevin Conder" <[email protected]>
> > > To: <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:35 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [CsndTek] Linux 2.6 Kernel, ALSA, and Varga Csound
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Iain Duncan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > What is fedora?
> > > >
> > > > From what I gather, RedHat has split their distro into an
> > > > enterprise ($$$) and a community (aka hobbyist?) version. The
> enterprise
> > > > version is sold along with their support. Fedora is their community
> > > > version (no charge, AFAIK) and doesn't come with any support.
> > > >
> > > > To avoid trademark restrictions on the community version, they
> > > > changed the name to Fedora. More Fedora information is available here:
> > > > http://fedora.redhat.com/
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Kevin Conder, kevin-NPx+F0K3cJ/[email protected]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > csoundtekno mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > > Subscribe, unsubscribe, change mailing list options:
> > > > http://plot.bek.no/mailman/listinfo/csoundtekno
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > csoundtekno mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > >
> > > Subscribe, unsubscribe, change mailing list options:
> > > http://plot.bek.no/mailman/listinfo/csoundtekno
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > csoundtekno mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> > Subscribe, unsubscribe, change mailing list options:
> > http://plot.bek.no/mailman/listinfo/csoundtekno
> 
> _______________________________________________
> csoundtekno mailing list
> [email protected]
> 
> Subscribe, unsubscribe, change mailing list options:
> http://plot.bek.no/mailman/listinfo/csoundtekno
> 

_______________________________________________
csoundtekno mailing list
[email protected]

Subscribe, unsubscribe, change mailing list options:
http://plot.bek.no/mailman/listinfo/csoundtekno
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.