Re: (no subject)
John Nowak <[email protected]> Sat, 19 Jun 2004 15:12:13 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.csound.tekno |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jun 18, 2004, at 8:03 PM, [email protected] wrote: > I have had a few ideas for synthesizer design which I was going to > implement in > c++/wxwindows/alsa, but after being introduced to csound, i think its > possible > to implement the ideas using csound as the synthesis engine. Always try and leverage existing software whenever possible. ;-) Csound can be used as a great foundation for many things. > I've heard athlon's are really nice for csound, but in looking up > performance > stats, it seems like p4 out perform athlons in floating point math, > where as > athlons out perform p4 in MMX instructions. Any opinions? I've heard many people report great results using the Pentium M chip for DSP-related apps in general. I know for some music softwares (such as Reaktor), many say the PM is quite a bit faster than the P4. I know that's not the best answer, and its lacking data to back it up, but my point is that you should not neglect to look at the "mobile" chip. It's quite a beast. - John _______________________________________________ csoundtekno mailing list [email protected] Subscribe, unsubscribe, change mailing list options: http://plot.bek.no/mailman/listinfo/csoundtekno