Re: (no subject)
Brian Redfern <[email protected]> Sun, 20 Jun 2004 13:04:16 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.csound.tekno |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Right now its just subjective, but I'm working with a more experienced programmer to create some hard number benchmarks, as well as learning to debug assembler errors, which crop up a lot in getting the software to compile in native 64 bit. But csound was running super fast for me, so I know there's definitely a boost there. I got the nvidia 3D card to work, so linux 3D games like TuxRacer are a lot of fun, with full screen, 3D graphics. I also found that the 64 bit laptop runs a lot cooler than my intel laptop, not sure why that is, but the 64 bit chip seems to run a lot cooler. On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, iain duncan wrote: > Brian Redfern wrote: > > I'm working on getting csound to compile under 64 bit for a line of new 64 > > bit linux laptops we're building for cosmoseng.com, right now just running > > cosund32 in emulation I still get a big performance boost with the > > athalon64, but once I've got a native 64 bit version of csound running it > > should perform like a monster. > > Any specific benchmarks, or even general figures? Ie how much lower is > the latency, how many more instruments, etc? Do keep us posted. I hope > to be able to buy a new machine by the end of the summer, and it would > be great to know whether the athlon64 is worth the extra dough. > > Iain > _______________________________________________ > csoundtekno mailing list > [email protected] > > Subscribe, unsubscribe, change mailing list options: > http://plot.bek.no/mailman/listinfo/csoundtekno > _______________________________________________ csoundtekno mailing list [email protected] Subscribe, unsubscribe, change mailing list options: http://plot.bek.no/mailman/listinfo/csoundtekno