Re: Accuraterip

"Fred Maxwell [email protected] [EAC]" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.eac.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"So by 'quality of extraction' do you mean the rip from the CD?”

Yes.

"So if I'm ripping from a CD as a Flac.”

EAC cannot do that. It only rips (extracts) uncompressed audio (44,100 samples per second by 16 bit sample depth by two channels) from the CD.  

"not having Accuraterip enabled will result in poorer quality?  “

Maybe.

Regards,
  Fred Maxwell
  Moderator, Exact Audio Copy Yahoogroup

> On May 28, 2018, at 3:29 PM, Chux Uchendu chuxuchendu-gM/[email protected] [EAC] <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Ok sorry now I'm confused.
> 
> So by 'quality of extraction' do you mean the rip from the CD? .. So if I'm ripping from a CD as a Flac. not having Accuraterip enabled will result in poorer quality?  
> 
> Cheers Chux 
> 
> On Mon, 28 May 2018, 19:36 Lin Sprague [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [EAC], <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>  
> On 5/28/2018 9:31 AM, Chux Uchendu chuxuchendu-gM/[email protected] <mailto:chuxuchendu-gM/[email protected]> [EAC] wrote:
> 
> > Just wondering if having Accuraterip enabled makes any actual difference 
> > to the quality of a Flac rip using EAC?
> 
> I can't speak authoritatively, but I assume Accuraterip has to do with 
> quality of the extraction, and would have nothing to do with the 
> subsequent compression of that extracted file. In other words, FLAC, 
> mp3, whatever, isn't relevant to Accuraterip.
> 
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.