| Newsgroups |
gmane.comp.audio.eac.user |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
Accuracy isn’t pedantry and demonstrating an understanding two’s complement integers is hardly an ostentatious display of higher learning.
Regards,
Fred Maxwell
Moderator, Exact Audio Copy Yahoogroup
> On Jun 6, 2018, at 7:45 PM, Jerry Baker jbaker6953-/[email protected] [EAC] <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I debated with my penchant for pedantry, but in the end decided I didn't
> want to confuse anyone with zero being a member of the range of 65536
> possible values.
>
> On 6/6/2018 4:15 PM, Fred Maxwell [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [EAC] wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Jun 6, 2018, at 6:23 PM, Jerry Baker jbaker6953-/[email protected] <mailto:jbaker6953-/[email protected]>
> >> <mailto:jbaker6953-/[email protected] <mailto:jbaker6953-/[email protected]>> [EAC] <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
> >>
> >> It's the amplitude of the waveform. With 16-bit audio, each sample's
> >> amplitude (distance from dead silence) can range from -32,768 to 32,768.
> >>
> > A “bit” picky, I know, but it’s a two’s complement integer, so the range
> > is -32768 to +3276*7*
>
>
>