Re: ecasound and PulseAudio problems

Lindsay Haisley <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.ecasound.general
Organization FMP Computer Services
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 21:20 +0200, Julien Claassen wrote:
> Hello Lindsay!
>    The commandline you posted was still wrong, it should have been:
> ecasound -f:16,2,44100 -i resample,22050,ghostrider.mp3 -o jack,system

Ah!  Success!!!  Now I know what you mean by a "resample object".  I
hadn't fully read the man page, or had forgotten some of what I read
(it's LONG!).

>    It's not perfect, depending on your Ecasound version and the resample 
> library, but nowadays it's OK. I see some warnings, since the MP3 is opened 
> with some external program (mpg321 or mpg123) in the background, but I managed 
> to do it.
>    You can create other devices in your .asoundrc. Probably something like:
> pcm.my_play
> {
>    type plug
>    slave "hw:0,0"
> }

This gives me "Invalid argument" - probably an error in the code, but
I'll research it.  Using -o:alsa,hw:0,0 with ecasound plays the file,
but at double-speed.

>    Or a s a slave try "pcm.!default". Not sure if this will work, but it might.
>    If you try to google "PulseAudio and xrun" you might get much more results 
> than you really want. :-) 

About 16,000, but still helpful :-)

> You might try to subscribe to the Linux Audio Users 
> list
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org
>    They are quite good, to the point and very knowledgeable. They've certainly 
> helpd me a great deal in the 11 years, that I've been there. :-)

I just subscribed to LinuxMusicians.  I try the list you suggest, too.

>  I remember, 
> reading a few thing about PA at some point. It's not Ecasound's fault there, 
> it's the setup.

That sounds logical.  

>    Other than that, just try to stick with jack, don't set the period size too 
> low, since it will increase xruns (128 on my system 2gHz CPU no graphics AT 
> ALL!), maybe 256. It's very durable and you'll always be in sync when 
> recording.

This is currently set to 16.  I haven't seen any xruns, but I'll keep
this in mind.

>    You might also try Nama, it might be easier as a frontend. It's tex based as 
> well. The interface "looks" similar" but has more high-level features. The 
> standard mastering setup also includes a LADSPA 4-band parametric equaliser. 
> If you fnd a better/different LADPA plugin it will be easy to put in there. So 
> for single track sessions you will be covered from the start and for others, 
> you can add the EQ yourself, which is easy. The debian package for the EQ is 
> called fil-plugins, should be the same under Ubuntu.

Thanks for these tips.  I'd like to find some reading material - online
or off - that would help me get my head around and grok the topology and
terminology of Linux sound processing.  I've had a lot of studio
experience, have wired patchbays, done non-musical programming, so I'm
not without a clue here, but I'm really not very familiar with how all
the pieces fit together when it comes to Linux audio signal processing.

-- 
Lindsay Haisley       | "Fighting against human creativity is like 
FMP Computer Services |   trying to eradicate dandelions"
512-259-1190          |    (Pamela Jones)
http://www.fmp.com    |


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Ecasound-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecasound-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.