Fortunate discrepency in man page about -etd

"S. Massy" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.ecasound.general
Message-ID <20120421005704.GB29072@solidbox>
Hello,

Well, I was fumbling around in audiofx_timebased.cpp, thinking about the
best way to implement a delay-only signal when I found this on line 268:
*l.current() = (*l.current() * (1.0 - mix)) + (temp2_left * mix);
...which means that I need look no further, but write this e-mail. For
-etd, the man page reads:
"'mix-%' determines how much effected (wet) signal is mixed  to  the
original." But in fact should read something like this: "'mix-%'
expresses the mix balance between the original and delayed signal, with
0 meaning no delayed signal, 100 meaning no original signal, and 50 (the
default) achieving an equal balance."

A few further remarks:
- Even though some boundaries are set for the mix parameter in
  EFFECT_DELAY::parameter_description, they don't seem to be enforced,
  and, if a value above 100 is given, some startling results may
  occur.
- Setting a delay time of 0 causes ecasound to segfault.

Cheers,
S.M.

-- 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________
Ecasound-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecasound-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.