Fortunate discrepency in man page about -etd
"S. Massy" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.ecasound.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20120421005704.GB29072@solidbox> |
Hello, Well, I was fumbling around in audiofx_timebased.cpp, thinking about the best way to implement a delay-only signal when I found this on line 268: *l.current() = (*l.current() * (1.0 - mix)) + (temp2_left * mix); ...which means that I need look no further, but write this e-mail. For -etd, the man page reads: "'mix-%' determines how much effected (wet) signal is mixed to the original." But in fact should read something like this: "'mix-%' expresses the mix balance between the original and delayed signal, with 0 meaning no delayed signal, 100 meaning no original signal, and 50 (the default) achieving an equal balance." A few further remarks: - Even though some boundaries are set for the mix parameter in EFFECT_DELAY::parameter_description, they don't seem to be enforced, and, if a value above 100 is given, some startling results may occur. - Setting a delay time of 0 causes ecasound to segfault. Cheers, S.M. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ Ecasound-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecasound-list