Re: ecasound for live band

Julien Claassen <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:00:58 +0200 (CEST)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.ecasound.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Raphaƫl!
   I would go for the version using loops. But perhaps you are not aware of 
Nama, which sits on top of Ecasound. It too is commandline based, but offers 
higher level functionality, such as tracks (with effects, dedicated inputs and 
the lot. It also has busses, so you could have a lot easier task for setting 
up your effects track for the vocalists and you should be able to directly 
create submixes. this functionality hasn't been used in a very long time, but 
it is there. I specifically asked for it once, since I was a member of a band 
and we used a similar setup with in-ear monitoring.
   Nama's homepage is here:
http://freeshell.de/~bolangi/nama/
   It is written in Perl and thus requires a lot of packages, but you could 
start from the cpan version and then update to the latest version through 
github. If you would choose that alternative, I'd be glad to assist or you 
could subscribe to the Nama mailinglist. It's a very small family and mostly 
quiet enough not to get flooded.
   Warm regards
           Julien

----------------------------------------
Music, creative writing, technical information:
http://juliencoder.de/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

_______________________________________________
Ecasound-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecasound-list