Why is "follow tempo" soooo bad?
"Logic Users Group" <po-r/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.emagic.logic.users |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello,
Sascha Franck has just posted in the Logic 9 forum of Logic Users Group under the title of Why is "follow tempo" soooo bad?.
This thread is located at http://www.logic-users-group.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4365
Here is the message that has just been posted:
***************
I know that for proper time stretching, one should rather use other algorithms, preferably even external ones (flex time very often doesn't cut it), but how can the "follow tempo" algorithm be *that* bad?
Here's an extremely simple sound example of a clean guitar (no plugins or whatsoever running) at 100 BPM, as recorded:
http://home.arcor.de/s.franck/temp/Logic/RawGit_100BPM.mp3
And here's the same file with "follow tempo" activated, at 101BPM:
http://home.arcor.de/s.franck/temp/Logic/RawGit_101BPM.mp3
Completely inacceptable for anything but perhaps something truly experimental.
In other words, "follow tempo" is not useable at all.
I wonder why anybody would still release time stretching algorithms that bad in 2010 (well, almost 2011).
- Sascha
***************
------------------------------------
The LUG has a new home on the web, to visit and sign up please go to:
http://www.logic-users-group.com/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/logic-users/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/logic-users/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/