Re: Packages of icecast 2.4-beta?
Daniel James <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.icecast.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Thomas, > My preferred approach would be to explain how to merge the debian > packaging with a more recent tar-ball and rebuild a package out of this. We can provide a wiki page on that, sure, although we would probably go one step further and actually provide the packages for our target distros too (Debian stable/testing and Ubuntu 10.04/12.04 LTS). > a PPA approach might be easier for interested parties. We provide apt.sourcefabric.org which is not a PPA as such, it's a regular apt repo. > When it comes to the 2.4 beta I actually made the conscious decision to > version it so that no extensions to the version number itself are > necessary to ensure a clean upgrade path. We usually handle that by including ~ in the suffix of the deb version number, which makes the version subordinate to any official Debian/Ubuntu release later. For example: liquidsoap_1.1.0~wheezy~sfo-1_amd64.deb counts as older than: liquidsoap_1.1.0-1_amd64.deb for upgrade purposes. > Beta1 is 2.3.99.0 Is a beta2 on the horizon? Or are there fixes since beta1 we should include as patches? >> > A possible alternative would be for us to provide an Icecast 2.4-beta >> > demo server that our community could use for test streams. > Well that's something in your decision scope that I can't comment on. ;-) Would it be generally useful to the Icecast community to have a 2.4 test server available? Or do people generally have spare machines to use for this? Cheers! Daniel