Re: Icecast 2.4 beta4 memory leak

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.icecast.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
  Hello!

On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 12:28:36 +0000
"Thomas B. Rücker" <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Can you please run Icecast under Valgrind?
> > I'm personally using:
> > valgrind -v --time-stamp=yes --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes
> > icecast -c /etc/icecast2/icecast.xml
> 
  I will test using this command, however I have never used Valgrind
and know absolutely nothing about it. But I'll try to log its output to
file.

> > With our experiments so far we were not able to see such massive
> > leaks. It would also help to know more about your setup.
> > Which distro is this on? Which version of it?
> > Built from source? OBS package?
  I use it on the Debian 7.2 (stable) system.   The OS is running on
the virtual private server.
  I compiled the IceCast package by myself and created a .deb-file for
it. After that I installed this .deb-file as an ordinary Debian package.

> >
> > By the looks of it each stream leaks something in your case.
> > How long are the songs you have in the playlists (Wondering how
> > often it gets metadata updates).
> 
  The songs are usually about 3 to 5 minutes long -- a usual radio
format.

> One thing I noticed from the 2.3.99.3 graph is that there the leak
> seemed to only occur for ices0. The 2.3.99.4 graph has it active all
> the time, so it's hard to tell, what's interesting though, is that
> ices2 now seems to have an impact on the growth rate.
> But without knowing more about the setup, server config, etc -  it's
> impossible to tell what really happens.
  According to my observations, every IceS stream adds some memory
leak. It was true both for the Icecast-2.4beta3 and Icecast-2.4beta4.
The only difference I noticed was in the actual leakage rate. It was
bigger for beta4.
  If you still have my old graph for beta3, you can see the transition
from the band #4 to #5. One of the IceS instances (the smaller one --
for the single stream) was turned off at that point. And one may
clearly see a sharp	change in the memory leakage rate (from 80
bytes/sec to 50 bytes/sec).

  Please let me know if I can help in some way. I'll do my best.
Meanwhile let me see what Valgrind shows.

  Regards,
    Vladimir


----- 
 <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Icecast-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.