Re: MPEG DASH
Daniel James <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.icecast.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Yannick, > Companies will not have to pay royalties or license fees because they > have implemented the DASH Standard using Qualcomm's DASH Essential > Patents within a standalone software application sold and distributed > separately from a product capable of implementing a WWAN standard My reading of that statement (as a non-lawyer) is that a handset manufacturer or Google itself might not be able to implement this standard for Android without paying a patent royalty. They also potentially include laptops and tablets in their definition of a WWAN device. > Yet, I don't know if Qualcomm is the sole patent owner for DASH. Always an issue for anything with MPEG in the name, it seems :-) > I am more interested in the P2P streaming > useage of DASH : Clients will be able to exchange DASH fragment over > WebRTC's Datachannel, so that less bandwith is consumed on the icecast > server. Sounds similar to Kamelia, although that was before the days of WebRTC: http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/publications/whitepaper113 Cheers! Daniel