Re: hostname resolution in libshout

RJ Ryan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.icecast.devel
Message-ID <CAKrSP5aDxQ28+TNEJxz8KJWU-_L2+0v9B__cNCduCa6c8us2hw@mail.gmail.com>
Hm, I attempted to file a ticket but was rejected:

Submission rejected as potential spam

   - BotScout says this is spam (Y|MULTI|IP|0|MAIL|0|NAME|2)
   - StopForumSpam says this is spam (username [40])

Maybe because I just registered?

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Ralph Giles <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2014-11-17 7:55 AM, RJ Ryan wrote:
>
> > They are requesting that libshout "fall back" on the ipv4 resolution of
> > the hostname if the ipv6 version fails to connect.
>
> Binding only ipv4 on an dual-stack server is a deployment bug, but
> libshout should fall back when running on a dual-stack client, as they
> say. Please do file a bug.
>
> I believe RFC 6555 describes the current best practice for this: clients
> should probe over both protocols when dns returns both ipv6 and ipv4
> addresses and use whichever to work around breakage like this (which can
> occur at intermediate routers as well as at servers).
>
> The http module in the opusfile library has an implementation of this if
> you want code to borrow.
>
>  -r
> _______________________________________________
> Icecast-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast-dev
>

_______________________________________________
Icecast-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.